SC dismisses plea for reprobe into Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination

+100%-

NEW DELHI, MARCH 28: The Supreme Court on March 28 dismissed a plea seeking a re-investigation into the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi.
A Bench of Justices SA Bobde and L Nageswara Rao dismissed the petition filed by Mumbai-based Pankaj Phadnis from Abhinav Bharat.
The Court, which reserved its verdict on March 6, had made it clear that it would not go by “sentiments” but rely on legal submissions to decide on the petition.
The Court had said the plea was based on academic research but that could not form the basis to reopen the matter that happened years ago.
Plea says there is need to probe if there was a 4th bullet
The petitioner had questioned the ‘3 bullet theory’ relied upon by various Courts to hold the conviction of Nathuram Godse and Narayan Apte, who were hanged. He had contended that there was need to examine whether there was a 4th bullet, and whether it was fired by someone other than Godse.
Phadnis had also sought the expunction of “adverse, unfounded” remarks made by the Kapur Commission in 1969 report against Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and the setting up of a commission to probe the conspiracy behind the incident.
Phadnis alleged that the Maratha community was “maligned” due to these adverse remarks, which should hence be removed. He said there should be a retrial of the case, which led to the conviction and execution of Godse and Apte on November 15, 1949.
‘Godse, Apte do not represent Maharashtra
The Court, however, said it did not share his sentiments that Marathas have been maligned and observed, “Maratha people have survived in spite of all this. You are talking about 2 persons who happened to be from Maharashtra. They do not represent the State. Observation about 2 persons does not malign whole Marathis.”
Phadnis claimed in his affidavit that the alleged conspirators were hanged even before the murder trial had attained legal finality from the top Court.
Gandhiji was shot dead at point blank range in New Delhi on January 30, 1948 by Godse, a right-wing advocate of Hindu nationalism.
Savarkar was given benefit of doubt due to lack of evidence.
Phadnis had challenged the decision of the Bombay High Court, which on June 6, 2016 dismissed his plea on 2 grounds – first, that the findings of fact have been recorded by the competent Court and confirmed right up to the apex Court; second, that the Kapur Commission had submitted its report and made observations in 1969, while the present petition was filed 46 years later.(PTI)